Why does New Hampshire favor Democratic candidates nationally but Republicans in the state?

Voting stalls fill the back half of the Mascenic Regional High School gymnasium in New Ipswich.

Voting stalls fill the back half of the Mascenic Regional High School gymnasium in New Ipswich. STAFF PHOTO BY ASHLEY SAARI

By CHARLOTTE MATHERLY

Monadnock Ledger-Transcript

Published: 11-11-2024 2:47 PM

Pembroke residents voted decisively in favor of Maggie Goodlander on Tuesday, where about 300 more people chose the Democrat to represent them in Congress over her Republican opponent, Lily Tang Williams. Vice President Kamala Harris almost pulled off a win there, too – just 45 fewer ballots were cast for her than former President Donald Trump in the town. 

Down the ballot, however, Pembroke trended conservative. Governor-elect Kelly Ayotte won the town by almost 600 votes, and residents picked all Republicans to represent them in the state Senate and House of Representatives.

It’s indicative of a larger trend. As New Hampshire voters repeatedly favor Republicans for state office, they continue to support Democrats for the White House and Congress. How does that happen?

Political scholars say it’s likely due to split-ticket voting. That’s when someone doesn’t vote straight down the party line – for example, some voters chose candidates from both parties, like voting for both Harris and Ayotte.

Christopher Galdieri, a professor of American government at Saint Anselm College, said split tickets are uniquely common in New Hampshire and that voters seem to differentiate between federal and state races.

“It’s really different from what we’ve seen in a lot of the country, where ticket-splitting like this has almost entirely died off,” Galdieri said. This could be due to the state’s political culture. “There’s so much value placed on independents, and most voters here think of themselves as independent voters rather than Democrats or Republicans.”

Undeclared voters are the largest voting bloc in the state, with over 318,000 registered compared to 308,000 Republicans and 269,000 Democrats, as of Sept. 30.

New Hampshire’s political outcomes are hardly a new phenomenon. With a few notable exceptions, voters have delivered wins to Republicans across the state for decades while simultaneously voting for an uninterrupted stream of Democrats for president since 2004.

Article continues after...

Yesterday's Most Read Articles

Dramatic rescue as dog pulled from ice in Dublin
Viewpoint: L. Phillips Runyon III – Memories of Richmond Hoxie at Peterborough Players
Tim Gordon returns to passion for cooking with Chislehurst Kitchen
Remembering Ed Mottau: Peterborough musician who played with John Lennon and nurtured local talent
Quinn Krook reflects on stellar soccer career at Mascenic
Three-alarm fire in Jaffrey displaces two families

This Election Day, New Hampshire voters, overall, selected Harris for president. However, Kelly Ayotte sailed to victory in the governor’s race, and conservative majorities in the state’s Senate and House of Representatives grew.

Galdieri said New Hampshire can be tricky for Democratic campaigns, demographically speaking. It’s not that they can’t win, he said, but their coalition looks a bit different here. In other swing states, Democrats often focus on turning out non-white voters and those in big cities.

“New Hampshire doesn’t really have a big city and it’s 93% white, so you’re stuck appealing to college-educated voters,” Galdieri said. The Granite State has a higher-than-average population of those with college degrees.

One explanation, said Dean Spiliotes, a political science professor at Southern New Hampshire University, could be that people are more likely to research candidates in bigger races, like for president or Congress, but tend to vote down party lines for smaller elections, like a state representative.

“The lower you go on the ballot, the more decisions tend to be kind of a function of party rather than the individual,” Spiliotes said. “The top of the ballot … you kind of look at the candidates a bit more, evaluate them a bit more individualistically.”

He added a few caveats: Not everyone votes in every race, and different races have different geographic boundaries. District lines can play a big part in which party is favored, he said. Galdieri said while that district lines may impact some governing bodies, like the 4-1 Republican majority on the Executive Council, he doesn’t see it happening in New Hampshire’s congressional districts – with only two districts, he said, it’d be hard to gerrymander.

While Spiliotes said down-ballot races tend to be more party-driven, Galdieri sees the personal and participatory nature of New Hampshire politics playing a role down the ticket.

“Politics is not this distant thing that happens far away. It’s something that people, your neighbors do,” Galdieri said, where people often know and interact with candidates and public officials. “It might be that that just, you know, it makes politics less of a team sport … I think maybe people have more opportunity to vote for the person rather than the party.”

Charlotte Matherly is the State House reporter for the Concord Monitor and Monadnock Ledger-Transcript in partnership with Report for America. Follow her on X at @charmatherly, or send her an  email at cmatherly@cmonitor. com.